mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fluency and Faithfulness in Human and Machine Literary Translation

arXiv 2605.15282 ↗First posted 14 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Literary translation requires balancing target-language fluency with faithfulness to the source. Recent large language models (LLMs) often produce fluent translations, but it remains unclear whether fluency corresponds to semantic preservation in literary text. We examine this relationship using 130,486 translated paragraphs from 106 novels in 16 source languages, including human, Google Translate, and TranslateGemma translations. Fluency is measured as original-likeness with a translationese classifier trained on paragraph part-of-speech n-grams, and faithfulness with the automatic translation evaluation metric COMET-KIWI. We control for paragraph length and find a consistent negative correlation between fluency and faithfulness. The pattern appears for both human and Google Translate, but is weaker and often non-significant for TranslateGemma. These results show that segment length matters for automatic evaluation and suggest a tradeoff between fluency and faithfulness in literary translation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 22 references.

References · 8

  1. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
  2. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  3. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  4. 2023Large language models effectively leverage document-level context for literary translation, but critical errors persistcited by 80
  5. 2022Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literaturecited by 45
  6. 2022DEMETR: Diagnosing Evaluation Metrics for Translationcited by 36
  7. 2024How Good Are LLMs for Literary Translation, Really? Literary Translation Evaluation with Humans and LLMscited by 23
  8. 2023The Inside Story: Towards Better Understanding of Machine Translation Neural Evaluation Metricscited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.