When Are Two Networks the Same? Tensor Similarity for Mechanistic Interpretability
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis
Abstract (arXiv)
Mechanistic interpretability aims to break models into meaningful parts; verifying that two such parts implement the same computation is a prerequisite. Existing similarity measures evaluate either empirical behaviour, leaving them blind to out-of-distribution mechanisms, or basis-dependent parameters, meaning they disregard weight-space symmetries. To address these issues for the class of tensor-based models, we introduce a weight-based metric, tensor similarity, that is invariant to such symmetries. This metric captures global functional equivalence and accounts for cross-layer mechanisms using an efficient recursive algorithm. Empirically, tensor similarity tracks functional training dynamics, such as grokking and backdoor insertion, with higher fidelity than existing metrics. This reduces measuring similarity and verifying faithfulness into a solved algebraic problem rather than one of empirical approximation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
21 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Everything, Everywhere, All at Once: Is Mechanistic Interpretability Identifiable?28 Feb
- 2024Bilinear MLPs enable weight-based mechanistic interpretability10 Oct
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability28 Apr
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretability12 Jan
Other references · 17
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 702
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
- 2024Have Faith in Faithfulness: Going Beyond Circuit Overlap When Finding Model Mechanismscited by 149
- 2015On the Expressive Power of Deep Learning: A Tensor Analysiscited by 97
5 more
- 2018Quantum Entanglement in Deep Learning Architecturescited by 50
- 2024Loss Landscape Degeneracy and Stagewise Development in Transformerscited by 40
- 2024Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficientcited by 40
- 2016Convolutional Rectifier Networks as Generalized Tensor Decompositionscited by 32
- 2023A technical note on bilinear layers for interpretabilitycited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Tracking Equivalent Mechanistic Interpretations Across Neural Networks
- 2025Combining Causal Models for More Accurate Abstractions of Neural Networks
- 2024Identifying Sub-networks in Neural Networks via Functionally Similar Representations
- 2025Tensorization is a powerful but underexplored tool for compression and interpretability of neural networks
- 2025Interpretability in Parameter Space: Minimizing Mechanistic Description Length with Attribution-based Parameter Decomposition
- 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networks
- 2026From Mechanistic to Compositional Interpretability
- 2024Using Degeneracy in the Loss Landscape for Mechanistic Interpretability