mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RoSHAP: A Distributional Framework and Robust Metric for Stable Feature Attribution

arXiv 2605.15154 ↗First posted 14 May 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature attribution analysis is critical for interpreting machine learning models and supporting reliable data-driven decisions. However, feature attribution measures often exhibit stochastic variation: different train--test splits, random seeds, or model-fitting procedures can produce substantially different attribution values and feature rankings. This paper proposes a framework for incorporating stochastic nature of feature attribution and a robust attribution metric, RoSHAP, for stable feature ranking based on the SHAP metric. The proposed framework models the distribution of feature attribution scores and estimates it through bootstrap resampling and kernel density estimation. We show that, under mild regularity conditions, the aggregated feature attribution score is asymptotically Gaussian, which greatly reduces the computational cost of distribution estimation. The RoSHAP summarizes the distribution of SHAP into a robust feature-ranking criterion that simultaneously rewards features that are active, strong, and stable. Through simulations and real-data experiments, the proposed framework and RoSHAP outperform standard single-run attribution measures in identifying signal features. In addition, models built using RoSHAP-selected features achieve predictive performance comparable to full-feature models while using substantially fewer predictors. The proposed RoSHAP approach improves the stability and interpretability of machine learning models, enabling reliable and consistent insights for analysis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  5. 2023Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Valuescited by 36
  6. 2024Statistical Significance of Feature Importance Rankingscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.