mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Widening the Gap: Exploiting LLM Quantization via Outlier Injection

arXiv 2605.15152 ↗First posted 14 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM quantization has become essential for memory-efficient deployment. Recent work has shown that quantization schemes can pose critical security risks: an adversary may release a model that appears benign in full precision but exhibits malicious behavior once quantized by users. However, existing quantization-conditioned attacks have been limited to relatively simple quantization methods, where the attacker can estimate weight regions that remain invariant under the target quantization. Notably, prior attacks have consistently failed to compromise more popular and sophisticated schemes, limiting their practical impact. In this work, we introduce the first quantization-conditioned attack that consistently induces malicious behavior that can be triggered by a broad range of advanced quantization techniques, including AWQ, GPTQ, and GGUF I-quants. Our attack exploits a simple property shared by many modern quantization methods: large outliers can cause other weights to be rounded to zero. Consequently, by injecting outliers into specific weight blocks, an adversary can induce a targeted, predictable weight collapse in the model. This effect can be used to craft seemingly benign full-precision models that exhibit a wide range of malicious behaviors after quantization. Through extensive evaluation across three attack scenarios and LLMs, we show that our attack achieves high success rates against a broad range of quantization methods on which prior attacks fail. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that the security risks of quantization are not restricted to simpler schemes but are broadly relevant across complex, widely-used quantization methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 41 references.

References · 28

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  9. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  10. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  11. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  12. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
16 more
  1. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
  2. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
  3. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  4. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
  5. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
  6. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 290
  7. 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 173
  8. 2023Universal Jailbreak Backdoors from Poisoned Human Feedbackcited by 128
  9. 2023On the Exploitability of Instruction Tuningcited by 116
  10. 2024Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 90
  11. 2024Exploiting LLM Quantizationcited by 65
  12. 2025Fewer Weights, More Problems: A Practical Attack on LLM Pruningcited by 7
  13. 2025SINQ: Sinkhorn-Normalized Quantization for Calibration-Free Low-Precision LLM Weightscited by 6
  14. 2025Pay Attention to the Triggers: Constructing Backdoors That Survive Distillationcited by 6
  15. 2025Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM Finetuningcited by 5
  16. 2026Adversarial Contrastive Learning for LLM Quantization Attackscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mind the Gap: A Practical Attack on GGUF Quantization
  2. 2026QuantGuard: Learnable Rounding for Repairing Quantization-Conditioned Backdoors in LLMs
  3. 2026AGENTQ: Quantization-Conditioned Backdoor Attacks on LLM Agents
  4. 2025Rounding-Guided Backdoor Injection in Deep Learning Model Quantization
  5. 2025On Jailbreaking Quantized Language Models Through Fault Injection Attacks
  6. 2021Qu-ANTI-zation: Exploiting Quantization Artifacts for Achieving Adversarial Outcomes
  7. 2024Taming Sensitive Weights : Noise Perturbation Fine-tuning for Robust LLM Quantization
  8. 2026Quantization as a Malicious Task: Removing Quantization-Conditioned Backdoors via Task Arithmetic ↗