mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning for Tool-Calling Agents in Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)

arXiv 2605.14126 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) is the dominant standard for interoperable exchange of healthcare data. In FHIR, electronic health records form a directed graph of resources. Answering clinically meaningful questions over FHIR requires agents to perform multi-step reasoning, filtering, and aggregation across multiple resource types. Prior work shows that even tool-augmented LLM agents (retrieval, code execution, multi-turn planning) often select the wrong resources or violate traversal constraints. We study this problem in the context of FHIR-AgentBench, a benchmark for realistic question answering over real-world hospital data, and frame reasoning on FHIR as a sequential decision-making problem over a queryable structured graph. We implement a multi-turn CodeAct agent and post-train it with reinforcement learning using a custom harness and tools. A LLM Judge provides execution-grounded rewards. Compared to prompt-based, closed-model baselines, RL post-training improves performance while enforcing data-integrity constraints. Empirically, our approach improves answer correctness from 50% (o4-mini) to 77% on FHIR-AgentBench using a smaller and cheaper Qwen3-8B model. We present an end-to-end post-training pipeline (environment building, harness construction, model training and custom evaluation) that reliably improves multi-turn reasoning over structured clinical graphs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

11 of 33 references.

References · 11

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  4. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
  5. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 537
  6. 2025Agentic Reasoning and Tool Integration for LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 107
  7. 2025Nemotron-Research-Tool-N1: Exploring Tool-Using Language Models with Reinforced Reasoningcited by 67
  8. 2026Trajectory2Task: Training Robust Tool-Calling Agents with Synthesized Yet Verifiable Data for Complex User Intentscited by 11
  9. 2026Lost in Execution: On the Multilingual Robustness of Tool Calling in Large Language Modelscited by 10
  10. 2026Robust Tool Use via Fission-GRPO: Learning to Recover from Execution Errorscited by 10
  11. 2025Question Answering on Patient Medical Records with Private Fine-Tuned LLMscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025FHIR-AgentBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Realistic Interoperable EHR Question Answering
  2. 2026Empowering Locally Deployable Medical Agent via State Enhanced Logical Skills for FHIR-based Clinical Tasks
  3. 2026HealthAgentBench: A Unified Benchmark Suite of Realistic Agentic Healthcare Environments for Challenging Frontier AI Agents
  4. 2024AGILE: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Framework of LLM Agents
  5. 2026MARC v1: An Open-Source Multi-Agent Framework for Clinical AI Reasoning and Coordination
  6. 2026MedRouter: Demystifying Knowledge Differences Across Medical LLMs for Routing-Based Reasoning
  7. 2026PatientAgentBench: A Benchmark Framework for Evaluating Patient-Facing Health AI Agents
  8. 2026MedCTA: A Benchmark for Clinical Tool Agents