Regret Equals Covariance: A Closed-Form Characterization for Stochastic Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantifying regret typically involves repeatedly re-solving a stochastic optimization problem across simulated scenarios. Such an approach is costly: the cost scales with the number of scenarios and the cost of each solve. We propose that regret can instead be measured using the joint moments of the cost vector c and the optimal decision π^*(c). Working with the optimal concave and Lipschitz under only a feasible region value function v(c) = minz∈ Z c^top z, we show that regret always decomposes as Regret = -Cov(c,π^*(c)) - R(c) for a residual R(c). We further show that R(c)=0 when π^* is affine in c, which holds for unconstrained and equality-constrained (e.g., budget-constrained Markowitz) quadratic programs and many, but not all, linear programs. For all cases, we give a distribution-free bound Regret ≤ D√tr(Sigmac) that depends only on the radius of the feasible region and the cost covariance. We also derive concentration and asymptotic-normality results for the empirical regret, the latter under an explicit and checkable non-degeneracy condition.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.
Builds on
24 of 96 references.
References · 24
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
- 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 612
- 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 588
- 2019Differentiable Convex Optimization Layerscited by 458
- 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 332
- 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 285
- 2021Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networkscited by 267
- 2019Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solverscited by 224
- 2018Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 220
- 2016Learning to Optimizecited by 195
12 more
- 2016Distributionally Robust Stochastic Optimization with Wasserstein Distancecited by 182
- 2019Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Theory and Applications in Machine Learningcited by 169
- 2021End-to-End Constrained Optimization Learning: A Surveycited by 154
- 2020Interior Point Solving for LP-based prediction+optimisationcited by 83
- 2020Learning with Differentiable Perturbed Optimizerscited by 81
- 2023A Survey of Contextual Optimization Methods for Decision Making under Uncertaintycited by 81
- 2020Finite-Sample Guarantees for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Breaking the Curse of Dimensionalitycited by 49
- 2020End-to-End Learning and Intervention in Gamescited by 19
- 2019Data-Pooling in Stochastic Optimizationcited by 14
- 2020Decision-Aware Conditional GANs for Time Series Datacited by 11
- 2017Learning-based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guaranteescited by 9
- 2023Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regimecited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Evaluating AI Investment Strategiescited by 0
- 2026Optimizing Regretcited by 0
- 2026Eigenvalue-Decomposition Cost Denoising as an Alternative to Predict-then-Optimize for Shortest-Path Problemscited by 0
- 2026Eigenvalue-Decomposition Cost Denoising as an Alternative to Predict-then-Optimize for Shortest-Path Problems14 Sep 2026
- 2026Optimizing Regret21 Jul 2026
- 2026Evaluating AI Investment Strategies7 Jun 2026