mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Formal Conjectures: An Open and Evolving Benchmark for Verified Discovery in Mathematics

arXiv 2605.13171 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As automated reasoning systems advance rapidly, there is a growing need for research-level formal mathematical problems to accurately evaluate their capabilities. To address this, we present Formal Conjectures, an evolving benchmark of currently 2615 mathematical problem statements formalized in Lean 4. Sourced from areas of active mathematical research, the dataset features 1029 open research conjectures providing a zero-contamination benchmark for mathematical proof discovery, and 836 solved problems for proof autoformalization. Notably, the repository provides a structured interface connecting mathematicians who formalize and clarify problems with the AI systems and humans attempting to solve them. Demonstrating its immediate utility, the benchmark has already been leveraged to make new mathematical discoveries, including the resolution of open research conjectures. We describe our approach to ensuring the correctness of these formalizations in a collaborative open-source project where contributions stem from an active community. In this framework, AI-generated proofs and disproofs serve as a valuable auditing mechanism to iteratively improve the fidelity of the benchmark. Finally, we provide a standardized evaluation setup and report baseline results on frozen evaluation subsets, demonstrating a climbable signal that measures the current frontier of automated reasoning on research-level mathematics.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 26 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  2. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 467
  3. 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 380
  4. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 275
  5. 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 153
  6. 2025Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correctioncited by 140
  7. 2019The Lean mathematical librarycited by 127
  8. 2025Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 96
  9. 2025Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2cited by 95
  10. 2025Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Provingcited by 47
  11. 2025FormalMATH: Benchmarking Formal Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Modelscited by 45
  12. 2026Numina-Lean-Agent: An Open and General Agentic Reasoning System for Formal Mathematicscited by 43
2 more
  1. 2025Seed-Prover 1.5: Mastering Undergraduate-Level Theorem Proving via Learning from Experiencecited by 36
  2. 2025FATE: A Formal Benchmark Series for Frontier Algebra of Multiple Difficulty Levelscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.