GateKD: Confidence-Gated Closed-Loop Distillation for Robust Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Distilling multi-step reasoning abilities from large language models (LLMs) into compact student models remains challenging due to noisy rationales, hallucinated supervision, and static teacher-student interactions. Existing reasoning distillation methods, including mentor-based approaches, predominantly operate in an open-loop manner, implicitly assuming uniform teacher reliability and consequently propagating erroneous intermediate reasoning. We propose GateKD, a confidence-gated closed-loop distillation framework that enables robust reasoning transfer by treating the teacher as a dynamic gatekeeper rather than a static oracle. GateKD introduces three complementary mechanisms: (i) confidence-gated soft supervision that selectively distills reliable predictive signals, (ii) gated hidden-state evolution that aligns intermediate representations only when teacher confidence is high, and (iii) reliability-filtered attention distillation that preserves stable reasoning structures while suppressing noisy patterns. These components jointly form a closed feedback loop in which teacher confidence continuously modulates the distillation process, reducing hallucination transfer and stabilizing student reasoning. Extensive experiments across commonsense, logical, and symbolic reasoning benchmarks, using T5 and Flan-T5 backbones of varying sizes, demonstrate that GateKD consistently outperforms strong open-loop distillation baselines. Notably, GateKD yields substantial gains in logical and symbolic reasoning, remains robust under low-resource distillation settings, and shows clear performance degradation when any gating component is removed. Our results highlight that confidence-gated closed-loop supervision is critical for building reliable and scalable small reasoning models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 20 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025RLKD: Distilling LLMs' Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning22 May
- 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillation28 Feb
- 2024Mentor-KD: Making Small Language Models Better Multi-step Reasoners11 Oct
- 2024Improve Student's Reasoning Generalizability through Cascading Decomposed CoTs Distillation30 May
- 2023Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillation2 Nov
- 2023PaD: Program-aided Distillation Can Teach Small Models Reasoning Better than Chain-of-thought Fine-tuning23 May
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models21 May
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models21 Mar
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan
Other references · 2
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning
- 2026Distilling What Matters: Confidence-Aware Selective Distillation for Large Language Models
- 2026Validity-Calibrated Reasoning Distillation
- 2025Distilling the Essence: Efficient Reasoning Distillation via Sequence Truncation
- 2026Collaborative Reasoning Distillation via Cross-Feedback and Coherent Curation
- 2026Learning to Revise Reasoning with Segment-wise On-Policy Distillation
- 2026Your Teacher Can't Help You Here: Combating Supervision Fidelity Decay in On-Policy Distillation
- 2026Explain in Your Own Words: Improving Reasoning via Token-Selective Dual Knowledge Distillation