mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decision Tree Learning on Product Spaces

arXiv 2605.12983 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.LG cs.CCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decision tree learning has long been a central topic in theoretical computer science, driven by its practical importance. A fundamental and widely used method for decision tree construction is the top-down greedy heuristic, which recursively splits on the most influential variable. Despite its empirical success, theoretical analysis of this heuristic has been limited. A recent breakthrough by Blanc et al. (ITCS, 2020) provided the first rigorous theoretical guarantees for the greedy approach, but only under the uniform distribution. We extend this analysis to the more general and practically relevant setting of arbitrary product distributions. Our main result shows that for any function f computable by an optimal decision tree of size s, maximum depth Dopt, and average depth Deltaopt, the greedy heuristic constructs an ε-approximating tree whose size grows at most with exp(Deltaopt Dopt log(e/ε)). In the special case where the optimal tree is a full binary tree, this bound improves upon the bound of Blanc et al. and holds under a strictly broader class of distributions. Moreover, we present an algorithm based on the top-down greedy heuristic that is entirely parameter-free -- it requires no prior knowledge of the optimal tree's size or depth -- offering a practical advantage over Blanc et al.'s method.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

7 of 19 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021Large Scale Prediction with Decision Treescited by 28
  2. 2021Properly learning decision trees in almost polynomial timecited by 20
  3. 2019Top-down induction of decision trees: rigorous guarantees and inherent limitationscited by 17
  4. 2019ID3 Learns Juntas for Smoothed Product Distributionscited by 13
  5. 2022Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Decision Tree Learning and Testingcited by 9
  6. 2022Open Problem: Properly learning decision trees in polynomial time?cited by 1
  7. 2026Active Learning for Decision Trees with Provable Guaranteescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.