mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Channel Closures in the Lightning Network with Machine Learning

arXiv 2605.12759 ↗First posted 12 May 2026cs.LG cs.SIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Lightning Network (LN) is a second-layer protocol for Bitcoin designed to enable fast and cost-efficient off-chain transactions. Channels in the LN can be closed either by mutual agreement or unilaterally through a forced closure, which locks the involved capital for an extended period and degrades network reliability. In this paper, we study the problem of predicting channel closure types from publicly available gossip data, framing it as a temporal link classification task over the evolving channel graph. We construct a dataset spanning over two years of LN activity and benchmark a range of machine learning approaches, from MLPs to temporal graph neural networks and spectral encodings. Our experiments reveal that the dominant predictive signals are temporal and behavioural, namely how recently each endpoint was active and the per-node history of past closures, while the surrounding network topology provides no additional benefit. We find that a simple MLP operating on edge-level features, node-level event counts, and temporal patterns outperforms all graph-based approaches, and discuss how the inherent privacy of the LN, where critical information such as channel balances and payment flows remains hidden, fundamentally limits the predictability of closures from gossip data alone. We publicly release the dataset and code at https://github.com/AmbossTech/ln-channel-closure-prediction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
  4. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 454
  5. 2019EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic Graphscited by 443
  6. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
  7. 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 154
  8. 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 141
  9. 2023Temporal Graph Benchmark for Machine Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 137
  10. 2022ROLAND: Graph Learning Framework for Dynamic Graphscited by 131
  11. 2021Discrete-time Temporal Network Embedding via Implicit Hierarchical Learning in Hyperbolic Spacecited by 67
  12. 2018GC-LSTM: Graph Convolution Embedded LSTM for Dynamic Link Predictioncited by 47
6 more
  1. 2024TGB 2.0: A Benchmark for Learning on Temporal Knowledge Graphs and Heterogeneous Graphscited by 35
  2. 2019Topological Analysis of Bitcoin's Lightning Networkcited by 5
  3. 2024Channel Balance Interpolation in the Lightning Network via Machine Learningcited by 3
  4. 2024Benchmarking GNNs Using Lightning Network Datacited by 1
  5. 2024Bayesian Binary Searchcited by 1
  6. 2024Joint Combinatorial Node Selection and Resource Allocations in the Lightning Network using Attention-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.