Ensuring Logic in the Fog: Sound POMDP Synthesis with LTL Objectives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Synthesising autonomous agents that can navigate uncertain environments while adhering to complex temporal constraints remains a fundamental challenge. While Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) provides a rigorous language for specifying such tasks, the inherent undecidability of qualitatively verifying LTL satisfaction in partially observable Markov decision processes renders quantitative synthesis difficult, especially when designing reliable reward signals for approximate solvers. In this paper, we bridge this gap with a novel, sound reward-shaping mechanism that dynamically generates belief-dependent rewards grounded in certified LTL satisfaction. By integrating this mechanism into an enhanced Monte Carlo Planning framework, we empower agents to navigate the `fog' of partial observability with a search process focused on maximising verifiable success. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach not only thrives in scenarios where existing solvers fail but also maintains effectiveness and scalability across diverse benchmark domains.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
7 of 27 references.
References · 7
- 2013What is Decidable about Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes with ω-Regular Objectivescited by 14
- 2020Enforcing Almost-Sure Reachability in POMDPscited by 13
- 2020Stochastic Finite State Control of POMDPs with LTL Specificationscited by 11
- 2014Qualitative Analysis of POMDPs with Temporal Logic Specifications for Robotics Applicationscited by 8
- 2020Point-Based Methods for Model Checking in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processescited by 8
- 2022Optimal Control of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes with Finite Linear Temporal Logic Constraintscited by 5
- 2023Optimal Control of Logically Constrained Partially Observable and Multi-Agent Markov Decision Processescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.