NOFE - Neural Operator Function Embedding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most dimensionality reduction methods treat data as discrete point clouds, ignoring the continuous domain structure inherent to many real-world processes. To bridge this gap, we introduce Neural Operator Function Embedding (NOFE), a domain-aware framework for continuous dimensionality reduction. NOFE learns function-to-function mappings via a Graph Kernel Operator, enabling mesh-free evaluation at arbitrary query locations independent of input discretization. We establish NOFE as approximation of sheaf-to-sheaf mappings, generalizing Sheaf Neural Networks to continuous domains. We evaluate NOFE across different datasets, comparing it against PCA, t-SNE, and UMAP. Our results demonstrate that NOFE significantly outperforms baselines in local structure preservation, achieving a local Stress of 0.111 compared to 0.398 for PCA, 0.773 for t-SNE, and 0.791 for UMAP for the ERA5 climate reanalysis dataset. NOFE also exhibits robust sampling independence, reducing the Patch Stitching Error by up to 20.0× relative to UMAP (59.0 vs. 267.6 under regional normalization) and ensuring consistency across disjoint domain patches. While maintaining competitive global structure preservation (Stress-1: 0.379 vs. PCA's 0.268), NOFE resolves fine-grained structures and produces smooth, consistent embeddings that generalize across varying sample densities, addressing key limitations of discrete reduction methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
- 2022Neural Sheaf Diffusion: A Topological Perspective on Heterophily and Oversmoothing in GNNscited by 214
- 2024Latent Neural Operator for Solving Forward and Inverse PDE Problemscited by 80
- 2022Sheaf Neural Networks with Connection Laplacianscited by 65
- 2024CViT: Continuous Vision Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 51
- 2024Continuum Attention for Neural Operatorscited by 40
- 2024Integrating Neural Operators with Diffusion Models Improves Spectral Representation in Turbulence Modelingcited by 36
- 2023Variational Autoencoding Neural Operatorscited by 22
- 2024Peridynamic Neural Operators: A Data-Driven Nonlocal Constitutive Model for Complex Material Responsescited by 18
- 2024Nonlinear model reduction for operator learningcited by 8
4 more
- 2024Assessing and improving reliability of neighbor embedding methods: a map-continuity perspectivecited by 5
- 2024Modulated Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators for Temporal Interpolation of Weather Forecastscited by 4
- 2021Modern Dimension Reductioncited by 2
- 2022Graph Convolutional Networks from the Perspective of Sheaves and the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.