Minimax Rates and Spectral Distillation for Tree Ensembles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tree ensembles such as random forests (RFs) and gradient boosting machines (GBMs) are among the most widely used supervised learners, yet their theoretical properties remain incompletely understood. We adopt a spectral perspective on these algorithms, with two main contributions. First, we derive minimax-optimal convergence for RF regression, showing that, under mild regularity conditions on tree growth, the eigenvalue decay of the induced kernel operator governs the statistical rate. Second, we exploit this spectral viewpoint to develop compression schemes for tree ensembles. For RFs, leading eigenfunctions of the kernel operator capture the dominant predictive directions; for GBMs, leading singular vectors of the smoother matrix play an analogous role. Learning nonlinear maps for these spectral representations yields distilled models that are orders of magnitude smaller than the originals while maintaining competitive predictive performance. Our methods compare favorably to state of the art algorithms for forest pruning and rule extraction, with applications to resource constrained computing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
32 of 76 references.
References · 32
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
- 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
- 2015A Random Forest Guided Tourcited by 168
- 2014Consistency of random forestscited by 85
- 2021On Explaining Random Forests with SATcited by 57
- 2020Born-Again Tree Ensemblescited by 38
- 2018Spectral Inference Networks: Unifying Deep and Spectral Learningcited by 35
20 more
- 2023A U-turn on Double Descent: Rethinking Parameter Counting in Statistical Learningcited by 33
- 2021Large Scale Prediction with Decision Treescited by 28
- 2022NeuralEF: Deconstructing Kernels by Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2014Mondrian Forests: Efficient Online Random Forestscited by 25
- 2020Interpretable Random Forests via Rule Extractioncited by 23
- 2014The Random Forest Kernel and other kernels for big data from random partitionscited by 18
- 2018Minimax optimal rates for Mondrian trees and forestscited by 18
- 2016Interpreting Models via Single Tree Approximationcited by 17
- 2024Operator SVD with Neural Networks via Nested Low-Rank Approximationcited by 13
- 2018On PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Random Forestscited by 10
- 2018Boulevard: Regularized Stochastic Gradient Boosted Trees and Their Limiting Distributioncited by 7
- 2022ForestPrune: Compact Depth-Controlled Tree Ensemblescited by 7
- 2020Inverse learning in Hilbert scalescited by 5
- 2023FIRE: An Optimization Approach for Fast Interpretable Rule Extractioncited by 5
- 2016Kernel regression, minimax rates and effective dimensionality: beyond the regular casecited by 4
- 2021Minimax Rates for High-Dimensional Random Tessellation Forestscited by 4
- 2025Autoencoding Random Forestscited by 3
- 2017Universal consistency and minimax rates for online Mondrian Forestscited by 2
- 2024A Unified Approach to Extract Interpretable Rules from Tree Ensembles via Integer Programmingcited by 1
- 2025Extracting Interpretable Models from Tree Ensembles: Computational and Statistical Perspectivescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.