mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Locking Pretrained Weights via Deep Low-Rank Residual Distillation

arXiv 2605.10777 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quality of open-weight language models has dramatically improved in recent years. Sharing weights greatly facilitates model adoption by enabling their use across diverse hardware and software platforms. They also allow for more open research and testing, to the extent that users can use them as checkpoints, fine-tune them according to their needs, and potentially redistribute them. In some cases, however, concerns on modifying these weights towards unauthorized uses may outweigh the pros of giving users such freedom. Defending against such adaptation is non-trivial: since an adaptive attacker can observe all weights and architectures by definition, they can reverse simple structural defenses, and use optimization to defeat the simplest locking mechanisms. In this work, we exploit the inference-training asymmetry of automatic differentiation as a novel defense axis. We propose DLR-Lock, a method where the purveyor of the model purposely replaces each pretrained MLP in their model with a deep low-rank residual network (DLR-Net) of comparable parameter count, forcing activation memory that grows linearly with depth during backpropagation. DLR-Nets are efficiently trained via module-wise regression. We show that, beyond this memory overhead, DLR-Lock results in architectural mismatches that complicate the optimization landscape of standard fine-tuning, and a backward pass that incurs disproportionately more overhead than the forward pass. Our defense succeeds in withstanding adaptive attackers with full knowledge of the defense strategy while preserving the original model's capabilities. Experiments on LLMs validate these claims.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

42 of 54 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  7. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
  8. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  9. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  10. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
  11. 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
  12. 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 848
30 more
  1. 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 264
  2. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMscited by 163
  3. 2024Nemotron-CC: Transforming Common Crawl into a Refined Long-Horizon Pretraining Datasetcited by 160
  4. 2024Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMscited by 138
  5. 2024Vaccine: Perturbation-aware Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning Attackcited by 115
  6. 2020BERT-of-Theseus: Compressing BERT by Progressive Module Replacingcited by 113
  7. 2024Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuningcited by 96
  8. 2022Less is More: Task-aware Layer-wise Distillation for Language Model Compressioncited by 93
  9. 2024Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Perturbationcited by 92
  10. 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearningcited by 84
  11. 2025Towards LLM Unlearning Resilient to Relearning Attacks: A Sharpness-Aware Minimization Perspective and Beyondcited by 79
  12. 2025Distillation Scaling Lawscited by 67
  13. 2024On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Modelscited by 65
  14. 2022On the Symmetries of Deep Learning Models and their Internal Representationscited by 64
  15. 2024On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMscited by 52
  16. 2024Targeted Vaccine: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-Tuning via Layer-wise Perturbationcited by 37
  17. 2025Symmetry in Neural Network Parameter Spacescited by 36
  18. 2025AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety Basincited by 19
  19. 2023Module-wise Adaptive Distillation for Multimodality Foundation Modelscited by 12
  20. 2025Disrupting Model Merging: A Parameter-Level Defense Without Sacrificing Accuracycited by 11
  21. 2025Distillation Robustifies Unlearningcited by 11
  22. 2025Model Immunization from a Condition Number Perspectivecited by 8
  23. 2025Model Unmerging: Making Your Models Unmergeable for Secure Model Sharingcited by 6
  24. 2026Antibody: Strengthening Defense Against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Gradient Influencecited by 6
  25. 2024m2mKD: Module-to-Module Knowledge Distillation for Modular Transformerscited by 5
  26. 2026Limits of Convergence-Rate Control for Open-Weight Safetycited by 5
  27. 2023Modular Transformers: Compressing Transformers into Modularized Layers for Flexible Efficient Inferencecited by 4
  28. 2025On-the-Fly Adaptive Distillation of Transformer to Dual-State Linear Attentioncited by 3
  29. 2026Towards Building Non-Fine-Tunable Foundation Modelscited by 2
  30. 2026Attention Editing: A Versatile Framework for Cross-Architecture Attention Conversioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.