mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EnergyLens: Interpretable Closed-Form Energy Models for Multimodal LLM Inference Serving

arXiv 2605.10556 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models span dense, mixture-of-experts, and state-space architectures and are deployed on heterogeneous accelerators under increasingly diverse multimodal workloads, optimising inference energy has become as critical as optimizing latency and throughput. Existing approaches either treat latency as an energy proxy or rely on data-hungry black-box surrogates. Both fail under varying parallelism strategies: latency and energy optima diverge in over 20% of configurations we tested, and black-box surrogates require hundreds of profiling samples to generalize across model families and hardware. We present EnergyLens, which uses symbolic regression as a structure-discovery tool over profiling data to derive a single twelve-parameter closed-form energy model expressed in terms of system properties such as degree of parallelism, batch size, and sequence length. Unlike black-box surrogates, EnergyLens decouples tensor and pipeline parallelism contributions and separates prefill from decode energy, making its predictions physically interpretable and actionable. Fitted from as few as 50 profiling measurements, EnergyLens achieves 88.2% Top-1 configuration selection accuracy across many evaluation scenarios compared to 60.9% for the closest prior analytical baseline, matches the predictive accuracy of ensemble ML methods with 10x fewer profiling samples, and extrapolates reliably to unseen batch sizes and hardware platforms without structural modification, making it a practical, interpretable tool for energy-optimal LLM deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
  3. 2021Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LMcited by 621
  4. 2024DynamoLLM: Designing LLM Inference Clusters for Performance and Energy Efficiencycited by 106
  5. 2025How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 73
  6. 2024LLMCO2: Advancing Accurate Carbon Footprint Prediction for LLM Inferencescited by 19
  7. 2025Characterizing LLM Inference Energy-Performance Tradeoffs across Workloads and GPU Scalingcited by 19
  8. 2023Clover: Toward Sustainable AI with Carbon-Aware Machine Learning Inference Servicecited by 16
  9. 2025Quantifying the Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of LLM Inference via Simulationscited by 12
  10. 2025From Prompts to Power: Measuring the Energy Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 12
  11. 2025A Systematic Characterization of LLM Inference on GPUscited by 8
  12. 2026SweetSpot: An Analytical Model for Predicting Energy Efficiency of LLM Inferencecited by 6
1 more
  1. 2025Fine-Grained Energy Prediction For Parallellized LLM Inference With PIE-Pcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EnergyLens: Predictive Energy-Aware Exploration for Multi-GPU LLM Inference Optimization
  2. 2024Offline Energy-Optimal LLM Serving: Workload-Based Energy Models for LLM Inference on Heterogeneous Systems
  3. 2025Modality Inflation: Energy Characterization and Optimization Opportunities for MLLM Inference ↗
  4. 2025The Energy Cost of Reasoning: Analyzing Energy Usage in LLMs with Test-time Compute
  5. 2026Characterizing Performance-Energy Trade-offs of Large Language Models in Multi-Request Workflows
  6. 2025Sustainable LLM Inference for Edge AI: Evaluating Quantized LLMs for Energy Efficiency, Output Accuracy, and Inference Latency
  7. 2026Beyond Test-Time Compute Strategies: Advocating Energy-per-Token in LLM Inference
  8. 2026Characterization of Request and Token Energy Costs for LLM Inference Workloads on GPU Platforms