mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Synthetic Pre-Pre-Training Improves Language Model Robustness to Noisy Pre-Training Data

arXiv 2605.10129 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) rely on web-scale corpora for pre-training. The noise inherent in these datasets tends to obscure meaningful patterns and ultimately degrade model performance. Data curation mitigates but cannot eliminate such noise, so pre-training corpora remain noisy in practice. We therefore study whether a lightweight pre-pre-training (PPT) stage based on synthetic data with learnable temporal structure helps resist noisy data during the pre-training (PT) stage. Across various corruption settings, our method consistently improves robustness to noise during PT, with larger relative gains at higher noise levels. For a 1B-parameter model, a synthetic PPT stage with only 65M tokens achieves the same final loss as the baseline while using up to 49% fewer natural-text PT tokens across different noise levels. Mechanistic analyses suggest PPT does not immediately suppress attention to noisy tokens. Rather, PPT-initialized models gradually downweight attention between corrupted tokens during noisy PT. This indicates that synthetic PPT inhibits noise self-modeling and shapes the subsequent optimization trajectory. Code is available at https://github.com/guox18/formal-language-prepretraining.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  4. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  5. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
  6. 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 763
  7. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  8. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  9. 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 548
  10. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  11. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
  12. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
13 more
  1. 2024Nemotron-CC: Transforming Common Crawl into a Refined Long-Horizon Pretraining Datasetcited by 160
  2. 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Lawscited by 144
  3. 2023What's In My Big Data?cited by 129
  4. 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 84
  5. 2020A Formal Hierarchy of RNN Architecturescited by 62
  6. 2025Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biasescited by 37
  7. 2023Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learningcited by 35
  8. 2025Do we really have to filter out random noise in pre-training data for language models?cited by 11
  9. 2026Procedural Pretraining: Warming Up Language Models with Abstract Datacited by 10
  10. 2025Transformers Pretrained on Procedural Data Contain Modular Structures for Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 9
  11. 2024Leveraging Web-Crawled Data for High-Quality Fine-Tuningcited by 5
  12. 2025Universal pre-training by iterated random computationcited by 5
  13. 2026An Empirical Study on Noisy Data and LLM Pretraining Loss Divergencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.