mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploitation Without Deception: Dark Triad Feature Steering Reveals Separable Antisocial Circuits in Language Models

arXiv 2605.09773 ↗First posted 10 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We use sparse autoencoder (SAE) feature steering to amplify Dark Triad personality traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) in Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and evaluate the resulting behavioral changes across five psychological instruments. The steered model becomes substantially more exploitative, aggressive, and callous on novel behavioral scenarios (d=10.62) while its cognitive empathy remains intact, reproducing the empathy dissociation characteristic of human Dark Triad populations. Critically, strategic deception is completely unaffected across all features, suggesting that exploitation and deception may operate through dissociable computational pathways in large language models. Individual feature analysis reveals non-redundant encoding, with each feature driving distinct antisocial mechanisms through separable computational pathways. We also show that feature discovery method itself modulates intervention depth: contrastively-discovered features change both self-report and behavior, while semantically-searched features change only self-report (d=12.65 between methods on behavior). These findings suggest that antisocial tendencies in at least one large language model comprise dissociable components rather than a unified construct, with implications for how such tendencies should be detected, measured, and controlled.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.

Builds on

12 of 28 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  2. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  3. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
  4. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
  5. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  6. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389
  7. 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 303
  8. 2019Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systemscited by 250
  9. 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 174
  10. 2025Model Organisms for Emergent Misalignmentcited by 84
  11. 2025Persona Features Control Emergent Misalignmentcited by 76
  12. 2025Large Language Models Report Subjective Experience Under Self-Referential Processingcited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.