The Silent Vote: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Reliability by Aggregating Semantic Neighborhoods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models are increasingly used as zero-shot classifiers in complex reasoning tasks. However, standard constrained decoding suffers from a phenomenon we define as Renormalization Bias. When a model is restricted to a small set of target labels, the standard softmax operation discards the probability mass assigned to semantic synonyms in the original distribution. This loss of information, which we call the Silent Vote, results in artificial overconfidence and poor calibration. We propose Semantic Softmax, an inference-time layer that recovers this lost information by aggregating the scores of the semantic neighborhood surrounding each target label. We evaluate this approach on Qwen-3 and Phi-4-mini models using GoEmotions and Civil Comments datasets. Our results demonstrate consistent improvements across all evaluation metrics: Semantic Softmax substantially reduces Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Brier Score, while simultaneously enhancing discriminative performance in terms of AUROC and Macro-F1. By accounting for linguistic nuances, our method provides a more calibrated and accurate alternative for zero-shot classification.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 16 references.
References · 15
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
- 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
- 2021Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parserscited by 162
Built on by
Not cited yet.