Physics-Informed Neural PDE Solvers via Spatio-Temporal MeanFlow
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning paradigms, such as PINNs and neural operators, have significantly advanced the solving of PDEs. However, they often struggle to capture the continuous integral nature of physical systems, relying either on pointwise residuals that ignore the integral perspective or on pre-discretized temporal grids. Drawing inspiration from MeanFlow, a continuous-time integrator recently developed to efficiently solve generative ODEs, we introduce Spatio-Temporal MeanFlow, which functions as a novel PDE solver learning the finite-interval evolution of physical states. By substituting the generative velocity field with the physical PDE operator, we transform multi-step numerical integration into an efficient prediction with a freely controllable integration length. Crucially, we extend the original MeanFlow constraint from the temporal to the spatio-temporal domain, coupling time evolution with spatial consistency. This yields a unified framework naturally accommodating both time-dependent and stationary PDEs. Comprehensive experiments on benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves superior accuracy and inference efficiency over representative baselines. Furthermore, the proposed integral constraint enables excellent generalization to out-of-distribution initial conditions and varying spatial resolutions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,822
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
- 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,114
- 2022Diffusion Models in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,015
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
13 more
- 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 427
- 2020Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 349
- 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 343
- 2022Understanding Diffusion Models: A Unified Perspectivecited by 340
- 2022Wavelet neural operator: a neural operator for parametric partial differential equationscited by 78
- 2023CoCoGen: Physically-Consistent and Conditioned Score-based Generative Models for Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 56
- 2024CViT: Continuous Vision Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 51
- 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraintscited by 28
- 2021Solving Partial Differential Equations with Point Source Based on Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2025Physics-Informed Distillation of Diffusion Models for PDE-Constrained Generationcited by 11
- 2025CFO: Learning Continuous-Time PDE Dynamics via Flow-Matched Neural Operatorscited by 11
- 2025Rectified Flows for Fast Multiscale Fluid Flow Modelingcited by 4
- 2024Improved physics-informed neural network in mitigating gradient related failurescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.