HTPO: Towards Exploration-Exploitation Balanced Policy Optimization via Hierarchical Token-level Objective Control
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a pivotal technique for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the de facto practice of mainstream RL algorithms is to treat all tokens of one response equally and assign the same optimization objective to each token, failing to provide granular guidance for the reasoning process. While in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, different tokens usually play distinct roles. Therefore, the current RL algorithms lack an effective mechanism to dynamically balance the exploration-exploitation trade-off during learning. To this end, we propose Hierarchical Token-level Objective Control Policy Optimization (HTPO), a novel RL algorithm that takes the divide-and-conquer idea to hierarchically partition the response tokens into specific functional groups from three aspects (i.e., prompt difficulty, answer correctness, and token entropy). Within each group, according to the contributions to exploration or exploitation, we design specialized optimization objectives to facilitate the effective execution of each token's expected functionality. In this way, HTPO can achieve a more balanced exploration-exploitation trade-off. Extensive experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks validate the superiority of our HTPO algorithm, which significantly outperforms the strong DAPO baseline (e.g., +8.6% and +6.7% on AIME'24 and AIME'25, respectively). When scaling test-time compute, the HTPO-trained model maintains a consistent performance advantage over the DAPO baseline, and the gap widens as the sampling budget increases, validating that our adaptive token-level control method fosters effective exploration without sacrificing exploitation performance. Code will be at https://github.com/xcyao00/HTPO.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
30 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 14
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Soft Adaptive Policy Optimization25 Nov
- 2025Know When to Explore: Difficulty-Aware Certainty as a Guide for LLM Reinforcement Learning29 Aug
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models28 May
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example29 Apr
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
- 2025VAPO: Efficient and Reliable Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Reasoning Tasks7 Apr
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model31 Mar
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild24 Mar
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
- 2025Ignore the KL Penalty! Boosting Exploration on Critical Tokens to Enhance RL Fine-Tuning10 Feb
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs22 Jan
2 more
Other references · 16
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 556
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedbackcited by 257
4 more
- 2024Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capabilitycited by 80
- 2025BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clippingcited by 47
- 2024Binary Classifier Optimization for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 44
- 2026Why Is RLHF Alignment Shallow? A Gradient Analysiscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Orchestrating Tokens and Sequences: Dynamic Hybrid Policy Optimization for RLVR
- 2025DGRO: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Exploration-Exploitation Control and Reward Variance Management
- 2026Decoupling Exploration from Optimization in RLVR
- 2025Unlocking Reasoning Capabilities in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning Exploration
- 2025Selective Expert Guidance for Effective and Diverse Exploration in Reinforcement Learning of LLMs
- 2025On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baseline
- 2026A Gradient Perspective on RLVR Stability and Winner Advantage Policy Optimization
- 2026LamPO: A Lambda Style Policy Optimization for Reasoning Language Models