mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Multi-Fidelity Learning for Predicting Three-Dimensional Flame Wrinkling and Turbulent Burning Velocity

arXiv 2605.08232 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.LG physics.comp-ph physics.flu-dyncited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-fidelity experimental characterization of turbulent premixed flames remains limited by the cost and complexity of advanced diagnostics, particularly under elevated pressures and intense turbulence where measurements of coupled flame morphology and burning dynamics are sparse. Here, we develop a hierarchical multi-fidelity neural network framework (MuFiNNs) to address this challenge by integrating sparse high-fidelity experimental data with structured low-fidelity representations encoding dominant physical trends. The framework combines hierarchical low-fidelity construction with nonlinear multi-fidelity correction to learn coupled geometric and reactive flame behavior while recovering discrepancies that simplified models alone cannot capture. The methodology is applied to expanding turbulent premixed flames to predict three-dimensional flame wrinkling dynamics and turbulent mass burning velocity across varying fuels, pressures, and turbulence intensities. Using experimentally informed low-fidelity trend models with sparse high-fidelity measurements, MuFiNNs accurately reconstruct observed flame behavior, enable interpolation across unseen operating conditions, and demonstrate robust extrapolation beyond the training domain. Importantly, the framework remains effective in noisy, weakly structured, or experimentally inaccessible regimes where conventional data-driven approaches often fail. These results show that hierarchical multi-fidelity learning provides a scalable and physically grounded strategy for predictive combustion modeling in data-limited regimes. More broadly, this work establishes multi-fidelity scientific machine learning as a practical framework for extracting physically meaningful predictive models from sparse experiments, particularly for instability-dominated and turbulence-sensitive reactive flows where high-fidelity data acquisition is demanding.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

6 of 50 references.

References · 6

  1. 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 233
  2. 2019PPINN: Parareal Physics-Informed Neural Network for time-dependent PDEscited by 116
  3. 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
  4. 2020nPINNs: nonlocal Physics-Informed Neural Networks for a parametrized nonlocal universal Laplacian operator. Algorithms and Applicationscited by 36
  5. 2022Scientific Machine Learning for Modeling and Simulating Complex Fluidscited by 7
  6. 2025RheOFormer: A generative transformer model for simulation of complex fluids and flowscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.