Observation-Aligned Two-Stage Domain Decomposition for Physics-Informed Traffic State Estimation with Sparse Fixed Sensors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traffic state estimation from sparse fixed sensors is challenging because physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) tend to over-smooth sharp transitions admitted by the Lighthill-Whitham--Richards (LWR) model. This study proposes Two-Stage Domain Decomposition Physics-Informed Neural Networks (TSDD-PINN), an observation-aligned framework for LWR-based offline speed-field reconstruction. The framework supports spatial, temporal, and space--time refinement. Matched direction analysis shows that spatial refinement has the lowest mean error and less than half the training time of space--time refinement in the tested setting, while temporal refinement is faster. A global parent PINN is first trained. In the controlled spatial implementation, its residual profile guides a deterministic partition for warm-started child networks. An optional operational safeguard retains Stage~1 when the prespecified screen does not activate. The primary I-24 MOTION evaluation spans five days, five sensor configurations, and ten seeds per configuration, yielding 1,500 runs. Controlled TSDD-PINN attains the lowest relative L2 error in 18 of 25 configurations and 14 of 15 sparse-sensing cases, while training 2.4 times faster than the extended PINN (XPINN) baseline under the evaluated implementations and training budgets. Non-neural comparisons show that the advantage over interpolation is concentrated under sparse sensing, whereas dense sensing often favors interpolation. A separate 250-run operational evaluation finds infrequent activation and motivates the Stage-1-preserving safeguard. The residual is treated as an indicator of model difficulty rather than a validated shock detector. The evidence supports a sensing-density-dependent operating range rather than uniform improvement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
4 of 69 references.
References · 4
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021When Do Extended Physics-Informed Neural Networks (XPINNs) Improve Generalization?cited by 58
- 2025AB-PINNs: Adaptive-Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Residual-Driven Domain Decompositioncited by 4
- 2025Potential failures of physics-informed machine learning in traffic flow modeling: theoretical and experimental analysiscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.