mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dooly: Configuration-Agnostic, Redundancy-Aware Profiling for LLM Inference Simulation

arXiv 2605.07985 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.DC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Selecting the optimal LLM inference configuration requires evaluation across hardware, serving engines, attention backends, and model architectures, since no single choice performs best across all workloads. Profile-based simulators are the standard tool, yet they hardcode their operation set to a specific configuration and re-profile every operation from scratch, making exploration prohibitively expensive. This cost stems from a missing structural understanding: every input dimension of each operation is fixed by the model configuration or determined by the incoming request. Many model-configuration values (e.g., head size, layer count) recur across models, so the same operation runs in many configurations; a single sweep over the request-dependent dimensions can serve them all. We present Dooly, which exploits this structure to achieve configuration-agnostic, redundancy-aware profiling. Dooly performs a single inference pass, labels each input dimension with its origin via taint propagation, and selectively profiles only operations absent from its latency database; stateful operations such as attention are isolated by reusing the serving engine's own initialization code, eliminating manual instrumentation. It builds latency regression models based on the database, which becomes a drop-in backend for existing simulators. Across two GPU platforms, three attention backends, and diverse model architectures, Dooly achieves simulation accuracy within 5% MAPE for TTFT and 8% for TPOT while reducing profiling GPU-hours by 56.4% across 12 models compared to the existing profiling approach. We have open-sourced Dooly at https://github.com/dooly-project.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  3. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  4. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  5. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
  6. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
  7. 2024DistServe: Disaggregating Prefill and Decoding for Goodput-optimized Large Language Model Servingcited by 617
  8. 2023Splitwise: Efficient generative LLM inference using phase splittingcited by 558
  9. 2024Taming Throughput-Latency Tradeoff in LLM Inference with Sarathi-Servecited by 526
  10. 2025FlashInfer: Efficient and Customizable Attention Engine for LLM Inference Servingcited by 258
  11. 2024Vidur: A Large-Scale Simulation Framework For LLM Inferencecited by 117
  12. 2024LLMServingSim: A HW/SW Co-Simulation Infrastructure for LLM Inference Serving at Scalecited by 31
6 more
  1. 2025SLOs-Serve: Optimized Serving of Multi-SLO LLMscited by 19
  2. 2024APEX: An Extensible and Dynamism-Aware Simulator for Automated Parallel Execution in LLM Servingcited by 15
  3. 2025LLMServingSim2.0: A Unified Simulator for Heterogeneous Hardware and Serving Techniques in LLM Infrastructurecited by 6
  4. 2026Revati: Transparent GPU-Free Time-Warp Emulation for LLM Servingcited by 5
  5. 2025The Anatomy of a Triton Attention Kernelcited by 3
  6. 2025Frontier: Simulating the Next Generation of LLM Inference Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.