mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vaporizer: Breaking Watermarking Schemes for Large Language Model Outputs

arXiv 2605.07481 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we investigate the recent state-of-the-art schemes for watermarking large language models (LLMs) outputs. These techniques are claimed to be robust, scalable and production-grade, aimed at promoting responsible usage of LLMs. We analyse the effectiveness of these watermarking techniques against an extensive collection of modified text attacks, which perform targeted semantic changes without altering the general meaning of the text content. Our approach encompasses multiple attack strategies, which include lexical alterations, machine translation, and even neural paraphrasing. The attack efficacy is measured with two target criteria - successful removal of the watermark and preservation of semantic content. We evaluate semantic preservation through BERT scores, text complexity measures, grammatical errors, and Flesch Reading Ease indices. The experimental results reveal varying levels of effectiveness among different watermarking models, with the same underlying result that it is possible to remove the watermark with reasonable effort. This study sheds light on the strengths and weaknesses of existing LLM watermarking systems, suggesting how they should be constructed to improve security of available schemes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 2 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

2 of 7 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models27 Oct

Other references · 1

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932

Built on by

Not cited yet.