mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Convergence Gap: Instruction-Tuned Language Models Stabilize Later in the Forward Pass

arXiv 2605.07282 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Final outputs hide when a checkpoint commits to its next-token prediction. We introduce the convergence gap, a model-diffing diagnostic that decodes each layer's next-token distribution and measures its distance to the model's own final distribution. Across six paired pretrained and instruction-tuned checkpoints in native prompting regimes, instruction-tuned checkpoints remain farther from their final predictions later into the stack. The effect persists under endpoint-matched raw and tuned readouts, endpoint-free same-history checks, and fixed-history template replay. Matched-prefix interventions identify late MLP windows as the largest tested leverage point: late IT grafts into PT hosts increase late KL by +0.34 nats, while PT-late swaps into IT hosts reduce it by -0.51 nats; matched random late perturbations give only +0.003 versus +0.327 for the true late graft. A preselected Gemma case study provides behavior-facing plausibility for the same late swap, without serving as a benchmark claim. These results identify a robust predictiondynamics signature of post-training: released instruction-following checkpoints tend to settle later, and late MLP computation is the strongest tested bidirectional handle on that delay under matched histories.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

3 of 4 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024The Remarkable Robustness of LLMs: Stages of Inference?cited by 146
  2. 2024Layer by Layer: Uncovering Where Multi-Task Learning Happens in Instruction-Tuned Large Language Modelscited by 15
  3. 2025Calibration Across Layers: Understanding Calibration Evolution in LLMscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.