Learned Lagrangian Models of PDEs via Euler-Lagrange Residual Minimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present the first method to directly use a learned continuous Lagrangian to forecast the dynamics of systems governed by partial differential equations, exploiting the inherent conservative structure to achieve stable long-range predictions. We develop an optimization-based integrator that minimizes the squared Euler--Lagrange residual via a mesh-free near-symplectic construction on local space-time patches. Different from integrators for analytical models, integrators for learned models should decouple model error (phase error) from integration error (conservation error). By relying on optimization rather than time-stepping, we bypass the global coupling inherent to fixed discretizations, which slows time- and space-stepping and complicates learning. Our method scales linearly with domain size via Jacobi iteration, and places no structural requirements on the learned network, allowing it to be coupled with existing physics-guided machine learning (ML) methods. We validate our approach on a learned representation of a double pendulum, a one-dimensional wave equation, and a two-dimensional wave equation. Our method achieves error comparable to classical symplectic methods while generalizing to spatially varying dynamics and arbitrary boundary conditions without retraining.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
- 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
- 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
- 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
- 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
- 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solverscited by 216
8 more
- 2019Deep Lagrangian Networks: Using Physics as Model Prior for Deep Learningcited by 212
- 2019Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 150
- 2021Equinox: neural networks in JAX via callable PyTrees and filtered transformationscited by 148
- 2020Simplifying Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Neural Networks via Explicit Constraintscited by 105
- 2021Physics-based Deep Learningcited by 68
- 2019Variational Integrator Networks for Physically Structured Embeddingscited by 36
- 2026Learning Relativistic Geodesics and Chaotic Dynamics via Stabilized Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2026Frequency-Separable Hamiltonian Neural Network for Multi-Timescale Dynamicscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.