mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Target-Aware Data Augmentation for SAT Prediction

arXiv 2605.06931 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning-based approaches to NP-hard problems have shown increasing promise, but their progress is fundamentally constrained by the high cost of generating labeled training data. In domains such as Boolean satisfiability (SAT), standard pipelines rely on solver-in-the-loop labeling, which scales poorly with problem size and limits the amount of usable supervision. This bottleneck hinders the broader goal of leveraging machine learning to capture structure in hard combinatorial problems. In this work, we propose a target-aware, solver-free data generation framework for SAT that produces correctly labeled SAT and UNSAT instances by construction, eliminating the need for expensive solver calls. Our method aligns generated instances with the structural properties of a target benchmark, making synthetic data effective for downstream learning. We further develop a linear-programming-aware graph neural network (LPGNN) architecture that incorporates constraint-violation residuals into message passing, enabling the model to exploit underlying optimization structure. Together, these contributions support a data-centric paradigm for learning on NP-hard problems, where scalable, task-aligned data generation is as critical as model design. Our approach yields orders-of-magnitude speedups in data generation, demonstrating that benchmark-aligned synthetic data can effectively augment solver-labeled datasets for GNN-based SAT prediction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

24 of 38 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  4. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  5. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  6. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
  7. 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 680
  8. 2019Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 318
  9. 2018Learning a SAT Solver from Single-Bit Supervisioncited by 200
  10. 2022Data Augmentation for Deep Graph Learning: A Surveycited by 133
  11. 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
  12. 2022Graph Data Augmentation for Graph Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 62
12 more
  1. 2022MIP-GNN: A Data-Driven Framework for Guiding Combinatorial Solverscited by 49
  2. 2021Goal-Aware Neural SAT Solvercited by 28
  3. 2020NLocalSAT: Boosting Local Search with Solution Predictioncited by 25
  4. 2019G2SAT: Learning to Generate SAT Formulascited by 20
  5. 2021NeuroBack: Improving CDCL SAT Solving using Graph Neural Networkscited by 19
  6. 2023G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networkscited by 18
  7. 2016The DRAT format and DRAT-trim checkercited by 3
  8. 2024Quadratic Binary Optimization with Graph Neural Networkscited by 2
  9. 2024Self-Satisfied: An end-to-end framework for SAT generation and predictioncited by 1
  10. 2025Structure based SAT dataset for analysing GNN generalisationcited by 1
  11. 2025MILP-SAT-GNN: Yet Another Neural SAT Solvercited by 1
  12. 2026On the Expressive Power of GNNs for Boolean Satisfiabilitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.