Streaming Adversarial Robustness in Fuzzy ARTMAP: Mechanism-Aligned Evaluation, Progressive Training, and Interpretable Diagnostics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial robustness has been studied extensively for offline deep networks, but less is known about strict single-pass streaming neural learners. This paper studies adversarial robustness in Fuzzy ARTMAP, an Adaptive Resonance Theory architecture based on category competition, complement coding, match tracking, and replay-free prototype updates. We introduce WB-Softmax, a differentiable white-box attack surrogate aligned with ARTMAP's category-competition and map-field prediction mechanism, and formalize a streaming evaluation principle requiring robustness to be assessed on the final deployed model. Across four image benchmarks, WB-Softmax achieves 89-100% attack success on vanilla Fuzzy ARTMAP models. We show that defense rankings can reverse across protocols: offline adversarial training may appear strong under transfer attacks yet collapse under adaptive white-box evaluation, whereas progressive two-stage selective training provides the strongest overall replay-free robustness. We further show that ART's explicit category geometry enables interpretable diagnosis of separation collapse and match-score inversion. These results provide a mechanism-aligned, protocol-aware framework for adversarial robustness in streaming prototype-based learners.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
28 of 44 references.
References · 28
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
16 more
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 350
- 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
- 2022A Survey of Robust Adversarial Training in Pattern Recognition: Fundamental, Theory, and Methodologiescited by 44
- 2022Online Continual Learning on a Contaminated Data Stream with Blurry Task Boundariescited by 31
- 2019A Survey of Adaptive Resonance Theory Neural Network Models for Engineering Applicationscited by 10
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
- 2023Adversarial Robust Memory-Based Continual Learnercited by 5
- 2023LRS: Enhancing Adversarial Transferability through Lipschitz Regularized Surrogatecited by 5
- 2025Deep ARTMAP: Generalized Hierarchical Learning with Adaptive Resonance Theorycited by 1
- 2025Deep Positive-Negative Prototypes for Adversarially Robust Discriminative Prototypical Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.