The Structural Origin of Attention Sink: Variance Discrepancy, Super Neurons, and Dimension Disparity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the prevalence of the attention sink phenomenon in Large Language Models (LLMs), where initial tokens disproportionately monopolize attention scores, its structural origins remain elusive. This work provides a textitmechanistic explanation for this phenomenon. First, we trace its root to the value aggregation process inherent in self-attention, which induces a systematic variance discrepancy. We further demonstrate that this discrepancy is drastically amplified by the activation of super neurons within Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers. Specifically, the channel-sparse down-projections trigger a dimension disparity of the first-token representation, necessitating the formation of attention sinks as a structural anchor. Then, we validate this causal chain through two controlled interventions: (i) isolating the aggregation effect via attention mask modifications and (ii) amplifying the variance of targeted token representations. Both interventions can replicate attention sinks at arbitrary positions. Our mechanistic understanding offers a foundation for the systematic control of sink formation. Finally, as a proof of concept, we propose textithead-wise RMSNorm, an architectural modification that stabilizes value aggregation outputs during pre-training. Our experiments demonstrate that restoring statistical parity across positions significantly accelerates convergence.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 31 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
- 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2024DuoAttention: Efficient Long-Context LLM Inference with Retrieval and Streaming Headscited by 288
- 2025Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Freecited by 283
- 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 243
- 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 208
- 2023Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do Nothingcited by 151
14 more
- 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 127
- 2023LM-Infinite: Zero-Shot Extreme Length Generalization for Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2022The Devil in Linear Transformercited by 98
- 2024LOOK-M: Look-Once Optimization in KV Cache for Efficient Multimodal Long-Context Inferencecited by 95
- 2024nGPT: Normalized Transformer with Representation Learning on the Hyperspherecited by 70
- 2024Theory, Analysis, and Best Practices for Sigmoid Self-Attentioncited by 64
- 2024Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinkscited by 56
- 2024IntactKV: Improving Large Language Model Quantization by Keeping Pivot Tokens Intactcited by 52
- 2024Prefixing Attention Sinks can Mitigate Activation Outliers for Large Language Model Quantizationcited by 33
- 2025Interpreting the Repeated Token Phenomenon in Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2025SeedPrints: Fingerprints Can Even Tell Which Seed Your Large Language Model Was Trained Fromcited by 10
- 2021Conversational Agents in Therapeutic Interventions for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Surveycited by 6
- 2026Transformers Are Born Biased: Structural Inductive Biases at Random Initialization and Their Practical Consequencescited by 6
- 2024Unveiling and Controlling Anomalous Attention Distribution in Transformerscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.