mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Invariant Features in Language Models: Geometric Characterization and Model Attribution

arXiv 2605.06458 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models exhibit strong robustness to paraphrasing, suggesting that semantic information may be encoded through stable internal representations, yet the structure and origin of such invariance remain unclear. We propose a local geometric framework in which semantically equivalent inputs occupy structured regions in latent space, with paraphrastic variation along nuisance directions and semantic identity preserved in invariant subspaces. Building on this view, we make three contributions: (1) a geometric characterization of invariant latent features, (2) a contrastive subspace discovery method that separates semantic-changing from semantic-preserving variation, and (3) an application of invariant representations to zero-shot model attribution. Across models and layers, empirical results support these contributions. Invariant structure emerges in specific depth regions, semantic displacement lies largely outside the nuisance subspace, and representation-level interventions indicate a causal role of invariant components in model outputs. Invariant representations also capture model-specific geometric patterns, enabling accurate attribution. These findings suggest that semantic invariance can be viewed as a local geometric property of latent representations, offering a principled perspective on how language models organize meaning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

16 of 22 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  3. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  4. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  5. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  6. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
  7. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  8. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  9. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
  10. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 280
  11. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  12. 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 216
4 more
  1. 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 68
  2. 2023From Text to Source: Results in Detecting Large Language Model-Generated Contentcited by 26
  3. 2023Source Attribution for Large Language Model-Generated Datacited by 11
  4. 2024Watermarking Language Models through Language Modelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.