Federated Layer-Wise Exchange for Cross-Client Money Laundering Pattern Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Subgraph pattern detection is a fundamental graph mining task central to anti-money laundering (AML) in finance. However, state-of-the-art graph neural network (GNN)-based methods assume centralized graph access, impractical when transaction data cannot be shared across institutions. In practice, graphs are distributed across clients, where local GNN training diverges from centralized learning, creating representation and adjoint equivalence gaps that induce a parameter-gradient gap. We formalize this as a structural observability problem, where AML patterns crossing subgraph boundaries become locally unidentifiable. To bridge these gaps, we propose a layer-wise exchange framework: clients synchronize node representations each forward pass layer and adjoints each backward pass, without exposing raw features or labels. Under a shared-parameter assumption, we prove node representations and parameter gradients are equivalent to those of centralized GNN training. Experiments on directed multigraphs with money-laundering patterns show layer-wise exchange performs best with per-step synchronization and remains effective under practical per-epoch synchronization. Our results show layer-wise exchange and parameter synchronization to be complementary, supporting distributed pattern detection in privacy-constrained financial settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 478
- 2021Identity-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 198
- 2017Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGDcited by 142
- 2021Subgraph Federated Learning with Missing Neighbor Generationcited by 132
- 2021FedGNN: Federated Graph Neural Network for Privacy-Preserving Recommendationcited by 98
- 2022Boosting the Cycle Counting Power of Graph Neural Networks with I2-GNNscited by 56
- 2023Realistic Synthetic Financial Transactions for Anti-Money Laundering Modelscited by 50
- 2023Graph Positional Encoding via Random Feature Propagationcited by 31
10 more
- 2023Provably Powerful Graph Neural Networks for Directed Multigraphscited by 27
- 2022FedGCN: Convergence-Communication Tradeoffs in Federated Training of Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 24
- 2023Fragment-based Pretraining and Finetuning on Molecular Graphscited by 20
- 2023MAGIC: Detecting Advanced Persistent Threats via Masked Graph Representation Learningcited by 20
- 2024Deep Efficient Private Neighbor Generation for Subgraph Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2023Federated Learning over Coupled Graphscited by 12
- 2022Maximum Common Subgraph Guided Graph Retrieval: Late and Early Interaction Networkscited by 8
- 2024Decoupled Subgraph Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2025Iteratively Refined Early Interaction Alignment for Subgraph Matching based Graph Retrievalcited by 2
- 2025Improving Subgraph Matching by Combining Algorithms and Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.