Covariate Balancing and Riesz Regression Should Be Guided by the Neyman Orthogonal Score in Debiased Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This position paper argues that, in debiased machine learning, balancing functions should be derived from the Neyman orthogonal score, not chosen only as functions of covariates. Covariate balancing is effective when the regression error entering the score can be represented by functions of covariates alone, and it is the natural finite-dimensional approximation for targets such as ATT counterfactual means. For ATE estimation under treatment effect heterogeneity, however, the score error generally contains treatment-specific components because the outcome regression is a function of the full regressor X=(D,Z). In that case, balancing common functions of Z can leave the treatment-specific component unbalanced. We therefore advocate regressor balancing, implemented by Riesz regression with basis functions of X, as the general balancing principle for DML. The position is not that covariate balancing is invalid, but that covariate balancing should be understood as the special case that is appropriate when the score-relevant regression error is a function of covariates alone.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
References · 7
- 2016Covariate Balancing Propensity Score by Tailored Loss Functionscited by 34
- 2024Applied Causal Inference Powered by ML and AIcited by 30
- 2023Augmented balancing weights as linear regressioncited by 21
- 2021The Balancing Act in Causal Inferencecited by 20
- 2025Direct Bias-Correction Term Estimation for Average Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 9
- 2021Optimal Covariate Balancing Conditions in Propensity Score Estimationcited by 6
- 2026Generalized Riesz Regression: A Unified Framework for Debiased Machine Learning with Riesz Representer Fitting under Bregman Divergencecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.