mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Does Trimming Help Conformal Prediction? A Retained-Law Diagnostic under Calibration Contamination

arXiv 2605.06204 ↗First posted 7 May 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trimming suspicious calibration points is a common response to contamination in conformal prediction. Its effect on clean-target coverage, however, is governed by the retained law induced by trimming, not by the contamination level alone. We analyse fixed-threshold trimming as conditioning rather than purification. It replaces the contaminated calibration law with a retained law, reducing clean-target coverage to a one-dimensional score-CDF transfer problem with an exact finite-sample identity. A componentwise bound on the transfer gap gives a population-level diagnostic. This separates a clean-side covariance cost from a retained-contamination cost, governed by the dirty-to-clean retention ratio. Trimming helps when the anomaly score separates retention probabilities while remaining score-neutral on the clean population. Otherwise, it cannot substantially reduce contamination through the retained mixture coefficient. We also give finite-sample certificate templates that provide numerical guarantees under independent audit.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

7 of 45 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  2. 2024A Conformal Prediction Score that is Robust to Label Noisecited by 13
  3. 2025Conformal Prediction under Levy-Prokhorov Distribution Shifts: Robustness to Local and Global Perturbationscited by 12
  4. 2025Exploring the Noise Robustness of Online Conformal Predictioncited by 5
  5. 2025Conformal Prediction with Cellwise Outliers: A Detect-then-Impute Approachcited by 5
  6. 2026Probabilistic Inference and Learning with Stein's Methodcited by 5
  7. 2025Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coveragecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.