mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Convex-Geometric Error Bounds for Positive-Weight Kernel Quadrature

arXiv 2605.05705 ↗First posted 7 May 2026math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Kernel quadrature can exploit RKHS spectral structure and outperform Monte Carlo on smooth integrands, but optimized quadrature weights are generally signed and may be numerically unstable. We study whether spectral acceleration remains possible when the weights are constrained to be positive, i.e., simplex weights. In the exact-target fixed-pool setting, an evaluated i.i.d. candidate pool of size N is already available and the task is to reweight it so as to approximate the kernel mean embedding. We show that this positive reweighting problem is governed not by the equal-weight empirical average, but by the random convex hull generated by the pool. Our main geometric result shows that the mean of a bounded d-dimensional random vector can be approximated by a convex combination of N i.i.d. samples at accuracy O(d/N) with high probability, sharper than equal-weight averaging in the fixed-dimensional regime. We transfer this d-dimensional convex-hull approximation to full RKHS worst-case error through an augmented Mercer-truncation argument. The resulting positive-weight KQ bounds consist of a spectral tail term and a finite-sample convex-hull term, yielding Monte-Carlo-beating rates in favorable spectral regimes, including near-O(1/N) rates up to logarithmic factors under exponential spectral decay. We also provide a constructive Frank--Wolfe algorithm that operates directly on the pool atoms, maintains simplex weights, and admits an explicit optimization-error bound.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 49 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 136
  2. 2014Control functionals for Monte Carlo integrationcited by 59
  3. 2021Kernel Thinningcited by 47
  4. 2016Support pointscited by 39
  5. 2021Stein's Method Meets Computational Statistics: A Review of Some Recent Developmentscited by 32
  6. 2014Sampling for Inference in Probabilistic Models with Fast Bayesian Quadraturecited by 31
  7. 2021Generalized Kernel Thinningcited by 29
  8. 2015Probabilistic Integration: A Role in Statistical Computation?cited by 26
  9. 2019Kernel quadrature with DPPscited by 26
  10. 2021Positively Weighted Kernel Quadrature via Subsamplingcited by 25
  11. 2015Sequential Kernel Herding: Frank-Wolfe Optimization for Particle Filteringcited by 22
  12. 2019Convergence Guarantees for Adaptive Bayesian Quadrature Methodscited by 22
13 more
  1. 2020Kernel interpolation with continuous volume samplingcited by 21
  2. 2022Nystr"om Kernel Mean Embeddingscited by 21
  3. 2015Frank-Wolfe Bayesian Quadrature: Probabilistic Integration with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 20
  4. 2022Fast Bayesian Inference with Batch Bayesian Quadrature via Kernel Recombinationcited by 20
  5. 2023Sampling-based Nystr"om Approximation and Kernel Quadraturecited by 17
  6. 2017Convergence Analysis of Deterministic Kernel-Based Quadrature Rules in Misspecified Settingscited by 16
  7. 2019Revisiting the Approximate Carath'eodory Problem via the Frank-Wolfe Algorithmcited by 11
  8. 2023Kernel quadrature with randomly pivoted Choleskycited by 11
  9. 2023Efficient Numerical Integration in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces via Leverage Scores Samplingcited by 10
  10. 2020Semi-Exact Control Functionals From Sard's Methodcited by 9
  11. 2015Tight Bounds for Approximate Carath'eodory and Beyondcited by 8
  12. 2017On the Sampling Problem for Kernel Quadraturecited by 7
  13. 2021Sparse solutions of the kernel herding algorithm by improved gradient approximationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.