The Pedagogy of AI Mistakes: Fostering Higher-Order Thinking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into higher education, its frequent errors and hallucinations, often seen as limitations, offer a unique pedagogical opportunity. By framing AI as a ``learning companion'' whose imperfect outputs prompt analysis, evaluation, and reflection, we argue that instructors can engage students in the fundamental processes of higher-order thinking. This paper presents a design-oriented study in which an AI-integrated syllabus in a textitdatabase design course deliberately leverages AI's limitations to foster critical thinking and higher-order cognitive skills aligned with Bloom's taxonomy of learning. Using a mixed-methods approach, we examine how structured interaction with AI-generated errors supports metacognitive engagement, reinforces disciplinary rigor, and relates to students' perceived AI literacy and subject-matter competency.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
5 of 19 references.
References · 5
- 2023Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programmingcited by 89
- 2023The Robots are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Educationcited by 86
- 2023Computing Education in the Era of Generative AIcited by 52
- 2024The Widening Gap: The Benefits and Harms of Generative AI for Novice Programmerscited by 48
- 2023MAILS -- Meta AI Literacy Scale: Development and Testing of an AI Literacy Questionnaire Based on Well-Founded Competency Models and Psychological Change- and Meta-Competenciescited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.