mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Tweet Sentiment Classification: A Case Study on the Sentiment140 Dataset

arXiv 2605.04888 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The exponential growth of social media has created an urgent need for automated systems to analyze unstructured public sentiment in real time. This study compares a traditional Logistic Regression model using TF-IDF features with a deep learning Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) architecture on a 10,000-tweet subset of the Sentiment140 dataset. Experimental results show that Logistic Regression outperformed BiLSTM, achieving an accuracy of 73.5% compared with 69.17%, while the deep learning model exhibited mild overfitting. These findings suggest that for medium-scale informal text data, classical machine learning with robust feature extraction can outperform more complex deep learning approaches. Finally, the trained models were integrated into an interactive web application using Streamlit and deployed on Hugging Face Spaces for public access.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

2 of 12 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2019Natural Language Processing, Sentiment Analysis and Clinical Analyticscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.