mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vol-Mark: A Watermark for 3D Medical Volume Data Via Cubic Difference Expansion and Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2605.04705 ↗First posted 6 May 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Today, advances in medical technology extensively utilize 3D volume data for accurate and efficient diagnostics. However, sharing these data across networks in telemedicine poses significant security risks of data tampering and unauthorized copying. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel reversible-zero watermarking approach, termed Vol-Mark, for medical volume data to protect their ownership and authenticity in telemedicine. The proposed Vol-Mark method offers two key benefits: 1) it designs a volume data feature extractor that leverages contrastive learning to efficiently extract discriminative and stable volumetric features, ensuring robustness against 3D attacks; 2) it introduces the cubic difference expansion (c-DE) technique, which leverages the 3D integer wavelet transform to embed watermark bits into neighboring voxels within cubes at low-frequency coefficients. The voxel differences within each cube are expanded to create embedding space, and a majority voting mechanism is employed during extraction to enhance reliability. The embedding process incurs low distortion and supports lossless removal, thereby preserving the integrity and diagnostic accuracy of medical volume data. Through these two benefits, Vol-Mark enables both integrity verification and ownership verification. Integrity verification is first performed, and ownership verification through hypothesis testing is further conducted to enhance reliability, particularly under data tampering or watermark removal attacks. Comprehensive experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed method and its superior robustness against conventional, geometric, and hybrid attacks on medical volume data. In particular, through multiple tasks evaluations, Vol-Mark consistently achieves an ACC above 0.90 in most attack scenarios, outperforming existing methods by a clear margin.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

Builds on

10 of 51 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 371
  3. 2019Med3D: Transfer Learning for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 282
  4. 2021nnFormer: Interleaved Transformer for Volumetric Segmentationcited by 179
  5. 2020Medical Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 163
  6. 2022Diagnose Like a Radiologist: Hybrid Neuro-Probabilistic Reasoning for Attribute-Based Medical Image Diagnosiscited by 21
  7. 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attackscited by 11
  8. 2024Learning Lossless Compression for High Bit-Depth Volumetric Medical Imagecited by 5
  9. 2025Deep Learning-based Dual Watermarking for Image Copyright Protection and Authenticationcited by 3
  10. 2024Boosting Memory Efficiency in Transfer Learning for High-Resolution Medical Image Classificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.