mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Regulatory Governance Framework for AI-Driven Financial Fraud Detection in U.S. Banking: Integrating OCC, SR 11-7, CFPB, and FinCEN Compliance Requirements for Model Development, Validation, and Monitoring Lifecycles

arXiv 2605.04076 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

U.S. financial institutions deploying AI-based fraud detection face a fragmented compliance landscape spanning four regulatory frameworks -- OCC Bulletin 2011-12, SR 11-7, the CFPB AI circular, and FinCEN BSA/SAR requirements -- with no integrated governance life cycle connecting these requirements to model development, validation, and monitoring practice. This paper presents the Regulatory Governance Framework for AI-Driven Financial Fraud Detection (RGF-AFFD), a three-tier governance architecture empirically anchored in a multi-study empirical program. Using the IEEE-CIS dataset (590,540 transactions) and ULB benchmark (284,807 transactions), we benchmark six architectures including an LSTM+XGBoost ensemble, and conduct ablation, temporal drift, SHAP interpretability, and BISG fairness analyses. The LSTM+XGBoost ensemble achieves ROC-AUC of 0.9289 (F1: 0.6360) with a benefit-cost ratio of 6:1. XGBoost demonstrates the strongest temporal stability (delta-AUC = -0.0017 versus -0.0626 for LSTM). The RDT-FG Regulatory Digital Twin meta-model translates metrics into four regulator-specific health scores and a composite Regulatory Fitness Index for continuous compliance monitoring. The RGF-AFFD is the first integrated deployment blueprint to simultaneously satisfy OCC, SR 11-7, CFPB, and FinCEN requirements, supported by a community bank implementation vignette and four evidence-based policy recommendations.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 26 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  5. 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.