mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Closed-Form Adaptive-Landmark Kernel for Certified Point-Cloud and Graph Classification

arXiv 2605.04046 ↗First posted 5 May 2026cs.LG math.ATcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce PALACE (Persistence Adaptive-Landmark Analytic Classification Engine), the data-adaptive companion to PLACE, paying a small cross-validation tier on three knobs (budget, radii, bandwidth; ≤ 5 choices each). A cover-theoretic core (Lebesgue-number criterion on the landmark cover) yields four closed-form guarantees. (i) A structural lower distortion bound λ(τ;nu) on Dn under cross-diagram non-interference, with a (D/L)2 budget reduction over the uniform grid when diagrams concentrate. (ii) Equal weights wk = K-1/2 maximizing λ, and farthest-point-sampling positions 2-approximating the optimal k-center covering radius; both derived from training labels alone, no gradient training. (iii) A kernel-RKHS classification rate O((k-1)√K/(γ√mmin)) with binary necessity threshold m = Omega(√ K/γ) from a matching Le Cam lower bound, and a closed-form filtration-selection rule. The kernel-Mahalanobis margin hatρMah is the strongest closed-form ranker across the chemical-graph pool (mean Spearman ρ ≈ +0.60); the isotropic surrogate hatγ/√K admits a selection-consistency rate, and widehatλ from (i) provides an independent data-level signal (positive on COX2 and PTC). (iv) A per-prediction certificate, in non-asymptotic Pinelis and asymptotic Gaussian forms, with no calibration split. Empirically, PALACE is the strongest closed-form diagram-based method on Orbit5k (91.3 ± 1.0%, matching Persformer), leads every diagram-based competitor on COX2 and MUTAG, and is competitive on DHFR (within 1 pp of ECP). At 8× domain inflation, adaptive placement maintains 94% while the uniform grid collapses to chance (25% on 4-class data).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 40 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  2. 2015Persistence Images: A Stable Vector Representation of Persistent Homologycited by 235
  3. 2019PersLay: A Neural Network Layer for Persistence Diagrams and New Graph Topological Signaturescited by 125
  4. 2017Deep Learning with Topological Signaturescited by 113
  5. 2019A Topology Layer for Machine Learningcited by 79
  6. 2017Sliced Wasserstein Kernel for Persistence Diagramscited by 77
  7. 2014A Stable Multi-Scale Kernel for Topological Machine Learningcited by 74
  8. 2019Learning metrics for persistence-based summaries and applications for graph classificationcited by 57
  9. 2018Persistence Fisher Kernel: A Riemannian Manifold Kernel for Persistence Diagramscited by 33
  10. 2018RetGK: Graph Kernels based on Return Probabilities of Random Walkscited by 32
  11. 2021Persformer: A Transformer Architecture for Topological Machine Learningcited by 19
  12. 2018DTM-based Filtrationscited by 16
2 more
  1. 2023Euler Characteristic Tools For Topological Data Analysiscited by 13
  2. 2026A Closed-Form Persistence-Landmark Pipeline for Certified Point-Cloud and Graph Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.