mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Posterior-First Neural PDE Simulation: Inferring Hidden Problem State from a Single Field

arXiv 2605.03247 ↗First posted 5 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural PDE simulators often receive only a single observed field at deployment. In this setting, a field-to-future predictor can collapse distinct latent problem states into the same deterministic interface, losing the ambiguity needed for reliable rollout and downstream decisions. We propose posterior-first neural PDE simulation: first infer a posterior over the minimal task-sufficient problem state, then condition prediction on that posterior. The resulting theory connects the object, the learning target, and the failure mode: Bayes downstream values factor through this posterior, refinement labels make it learnable by proper scoring rules, and deterministic collapse incurs an ambiguity barrier whenever the true posterior is non-Dirac. Synthetic exact-ambiguity experiments show that point-versus-posterior gaps track the predicted barrier. On metadata-hidden PDEBench tasks, posterior recovery reduces pooled rollout nRMSE from 0.175 to 0.132, closing 59.4% of the direct-to-oracle gap. These results suggest that single-observation neural PDE simulation should be posterior-first rather than monolithic field-to-future prediction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  5. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  6. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  7. 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
  8. 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
  9. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
  10. 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 233
  11. 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solverscited by 205
  12. 2020BayesFlow: Learning complex stochastic models with invertible neural networkscited by 139
7 more
  1. 2023In-Context Operator Learning with Data Prompts for Differential Equation Problemscited by 98
  2. 2024Unisolver: PDE-Conditional Transformers Towards Universal Neural PDE Solverscited by 31
  3. 2024On the Benefits of Memory for Modeling Time-Dependent PDEscited by 30
  4. 2022Semi-supervised Invertible Neural Operators for Bayesian Inverse Problemscited by 25
  5. 2022Approximate Bayesian Neural Operators: Uncertainty Quantification for Parametric PDEscited by 24
  6. 2025DISCO: learning to DISCover an evolution Operator for multi-physics-agnostic predictioncited by 21
  7. 2024Zebra: In-Context Generative Pretraining for Solving Parametric PDEscited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.