mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Finite-Size Gradient Transport in Large Language Model Pretraining: From Cascade Size to Intensive Transport Efficiency

arXiv 2605.02968 ↗First posted 3 May 2026cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a finite-size gradient-transport framework for real language-model training, based on five observables (D,z,β,δ,vrel) that separate cascade size, duration, absolute transport, and intensive transport efficiency. We analyze direct raw-gradient measurements from Pico-LM across four scales and 125 aligned steps, together with a five-scale Pythia companion dataset built from 153 aligned checkpoint-difference update fields. The same algebraic closure holds in both families, and both share a near-unity cascade-size backbone, but they occupy distinct transport regimes: Pico-LM shows positive duration scaling and negative intensive-efficiency scaling, whereas Pythia remains near the D=1 baseline with only weak positive efficiency scale dependence. Randomized-field controls give nearly matched null floors in the intensive and duration channels, indicating that the contrast reflects different real departures from a shared null skeleton rather than different null calibrations. The families also differ in stepwise power-law compressibility: Pico-LM retains clean duration and efficiency power laws, whereas Pythia preserves the size backbone but shows weaker one-slope compressibility in those channels. External performance associations are correspondingly channel-level, carried mainly by vrel and normalized cascade duration, while D(t) acts as a shared size backbone without a significant exponent-level performance association. These results support a reusable transport measurement framework without claiming a universal fixed point or a first-principles derivation of neural scaling laws.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

Builds on

2 of 4 references.

References · 2

  1. 2026Grokking as Dimensional Phase Transition in Neural Networkscited by 4
  2. 2026Dimensional Criticality at Grokking Across MLPs and Transformerscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.