mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Coherent Hierarchical Multi-Label Learning to Defer for Medical Imaging

arXiv 2605.02734 ↗First posted 4 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning to Defer (L2D) enables a model to predict autonomously or defer to an expert, but prior work largely assumes flat label spaces. We study the first L2D setting with hierarchical multi-label decisions, motivated by medical-imaging workflows in which findings are organised by clinical taxonomies. In this setting, deferral is a delegation action rather than a label assignment, so treating it as an independent per-label decision can produce deferral incoherence, including taxonomic contradictions, delegation violations, and deferrals of labels already implied by the model's own assertions. We formalise coherent hierarchical deferral under a Selective-Exclusion handoff contract, characterise the Bayes-optimal coherent deferral rule, and show that even nodewise Bayes L2D can be action-incoherent. We then propose two remedies: exact coherent projection, a dynamic-programming decoder over the coherent action set, and Taxonomic Belief Propagation (TBP) with Recursive Policy Optimisation (RPO), a contract-aware joint action model trained through the same recursion used at inference. Across real-reader and controlled-expert medical-imaging benchmarks, naive binary-relevance L2D exhibits non-trivial incoherence. Projection removes it exactly, and fast TBP+RPO drives incoherence near zero while retaining strong utility.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

Builds on

2 of 33 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task Learningcited by 17
  2. 2025Why Ask One When You Can Ask k? Learning-to-Defer to the Top-k Expertscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.