Convolutional Neural Networks in Vis-NIR Chemometrics: From Contradiction to Conditional Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Near-infrared (NIR and Vis-NIR) spectroscopy is widely used for rapid, non-destructive analysis in food, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, process analytical technology, and bioprocess monitoring. Nevertheless, deep-learning studies in NIR chemometrics often reach conflicting conclusions about convolutional neural network (CNN) design, including kernel size, depth, preprocessing, model complexity, and transfer robustness. This review argues that many apparent contradictions reflect incomplete experimental conditioning rather than incompatible findings. CNN performance depends on interactions among spectral physics, dataset regime, acquisition protocol, validation design, and deployment conditions. We organize the literature around three moderators. First, NIR signals are indirect, highly collinear, and shaped by broad overlapping bands, scattering, temperature, and matrix effects. Second, CNN design should be interpreted through receptive-field reasoning: kernel size, depth, dilation, and multi-scale branches determine the wavelength span available to the model, whereas the effective receptive field indicates which parts are actually used. Third, validation design can behave as a hidden hyperparameter because random splits may reward architectures that exploit shared batch, instrument, season, or process-run structure instead of transferable chemical information. We therefore propose a conditional design framework in which preprocessing, architecture, hyperparameter optimization, transfer evaluation, interpretability, and reproducibility are treated as coupled components. Rather than seeking a universally optimal CNN, the framework aims to support physics-aware, shift-aware, and reproducible model comparison in NIR chemometrics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 114 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.
Builds on
22 of 114 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
10 more
- 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
- 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 930
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 653
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
- 2017Data Augmentation of Spectral Data for Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Based Deep Chemometricscited by 6
- 2022Explainable Predictive Modeling for Limited Spectral Datacited by 2
- 2022Automatic Neural Network Hyperparameter Optimization for Extrapolation: Lessons Learned from Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy of Mango Fruitcited by 2
- 2026SHAPCA: Consistent and Interpretable Explanations for Machine Learning Models on Spectroscopy Datacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.