StressEval: Failure-Driven Dynamic Benchmarking for Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Static benchmarks for LLMs are increasingly compromised by contamination and overfitting especially on knowledge intensive reasoning tasks While recent dynamic benchmarks can alleviate staleness they often increase difficulty at the expense of answerability and controllability In this paper we propose StressEval a failure driven data synthesis framework that turns observed model failures into dynamic challenging and controllable test instances StressEval consists of three stages first it constructs a semi structured difficulty card that identifies the failed reasoning step and its root cause second it applies a dual perspective instance synthesis method that targets both knowledge gaps and reasoning breakdowns while preserving the underlying difficulty factors and third it applies a gating mechanism to retain only grounded unambiguous instances Seeding from multiple knowledge intensive reasoning datasets we employ StressEval to build Dynamic OneEval a focused suite of challenging dynamic benchmark Across several state of the art LLMs Dynamic OneEval yields substantially larger performance drops than the original benchmarks while retaining explicit difficulty factors enabling more actionable iteration
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.
Builds on
24 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 23
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
11 more
- 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
- 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 409
- 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 242
- 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 211
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 200
- 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 193
- 2023Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Modelscited by 136
- 2024Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee Discussionscited by 40
- 2021Outlining and Filling: Hierarchical Query Graph Generation for Answering Complex Questions over Knowledge Graphscited by 16
- 2024Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Explorationcited by 7
- 2025OneEval: Benchmarking LLM Knowledge-intensive Reasoning over Diverse Knowledge Basescited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classes
- 2026Large Language Model Reasoning Failures
- 2026Dissecting Failure Dynamics in Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2026"I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Time
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2024DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph
- 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning
- 2025Not All Errors Are Created Equal: ASCoT Addresses Late-Stage Fragility in Efficient LLM Reasoning