Perturb and Correct: Post-Hoc Ensembles using Affine Redundancy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Models that are nearly indistinguishable on in-distribution data can behave very differently under distribution shift. We introduce Perturb-and-Correct (P&C), a post-hoc method for constructing epistemically diverse predictors from a single pretrained network. P&C applies random hidden-layer perturbations with a least-squares correction in the following affine layer, producing predictors that agree on calibration data while remaining free to disagree away from it. We analyze this mechanism through the post-correction residual that remains in the activation of the layer corrected using calibration data, yielding a leverage-based preservation bound and a covariance interpretation of ensemble disagreement. Empirically, P&C achieves a strong ID/OOD tradeoff across MuJoCo dynamics prediction and CIFAR-10 OOD detection, and scales to a pretrained ViT-B/16 on ImageNet-1K. In matched comparisons with Deep Ensembles, P&C substantially reduces construction and storage cost. Our findings highlight the potential in further exploiting overparameterization as a strength of deep learning models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 34 references.
References · 25
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
13 more
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 368
- 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
- 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
- 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 178
- 2021Epistemic Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2019Subspace Inference for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 94
- 2020Masksembles for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 88
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inferencecited by 85
- 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
- 2021Sketching Curvature for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection for Deep Neural Networkscited by 32
Built on by
Not cited yet.