mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fine-Tuning Pre-Trained Code Models for AI-Generated Code Detection

arXiv 2605.01596 ↗First posted 2 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper describes the system submitted by team Archaeology to SemEval-2026 Task~13 on AI-generated code detection. The shared task consists of three subtasks; we participate in Subtask-A (binary classification: human-written vs. AI-generated code) and Subtask-B (11-class attribution of the generating model). Starting from a TF-IDF and Logistic Regression baseline, we fine-tune four pre-trained code models (CodeBERT, GraphCodeBERT, UniXcoder, and CodeT5+) with separate strategies for each subtask. For Subtask-A, we use leave-one-language-out cross-validation, code augmentation, chunked inference with trimmed-mean aggregation, and threshold calibration on a difficult dataset. For Subtask-B, we use sandwich token packing, class-balanced loss, and multi-seed ensembling with test-time augmentation. Our best submissions obtain macro-F1 scores of 0.737 on Subtask-A (6th/81 teams) and 0.422 on Subtask-B (7th/34 teams).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2026.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  3. 2020GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data Flowcited by 609
  4. 2022UniXcoder: Unified Cross-Modal Pre-training for Code Representationcited by 361
  5. 2024Granite Code Models: A Family of Open Foundation Models for Code Intelligencecited by 117

Built on by

Not cited yet.