mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Good in Bad (GiB): Sifting Through End-user Demonstrations for Learning a Better Policy

arXiv 2605.01529 ↗First posted 2 May 2026cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Robot manipulation imitation learning

Abstract (arXiv)

Imitation learning offers a promising framework for enabling robots to acquire diverse skills from human users. However, most imitation learning algorithms assume access to high-quality demonstrations an unrealistic expectation when collecting data from non-expert users, whose demonstrations often contain inadvertent errors. Naively learning from such demonstrations can result in unsafe policy behavior, while discarding entire demonstrations due to occasional mistakes wastes valuable data, especially in low-data settings. In this work, we introduce GiB (Good-in-Bad), an algorithm that automatically identifies and discards erroneous subtasks within demonstrations while preserving high-quality subtasks. The filtered data can then be used by any policy learning algorithm to train more robust policies. GiB first trains a self-supervised model to learn latent features and assigns binary weights to label each demonstration as good or bad. It then models the latent feature distribution of high-quality segments and uses the Mahalanobis distance to detect and evaluate poor-quality subtasks. We validate GiB on the Franka robot in both simulated and real-world multi-step tasks, demonstrating improved policy performance when learning from mixed-quality human demonstrations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robot manipulation imitation learning, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Ergodic imitation: Learning from what to do and what not to do
  2. 2023Good Better Best: Self-Motivated Imitation Learning for noisy Demonstrations
  3. 2021Confidence-Aware Imitation Learning from Demonstrations with Varying Optimality
  4. 2022Robust Learning from Observation with Model Misspecification
  5. 2022Imitation Learning by Estimating Expertise of Demonstrators
  6. 2024VITAL: Interactive Few-Shot Imitation Learning via Visual Human-in-the-Loop Corrections
  7. 2023Learning to Discern: Imitating Heterogeneous Human Demonstrations with Preference and Representation Learning
  8. 2024Learning from 10 Demos: Generalisable and Sample-Efficient Policy Learning with Oriented Affordance Frames