mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FeedbackLLM: Metadata driven Multi-Agentic Language Agnostic Test Case Generator with Evolving prompt and Coverage Feedback

arXiv 2605.01264 ↗First posted 2 May 2026cs.SE cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional approaches to test case generation often involve manual effort and incur significant computational overhead. Additionally, these approaches are not scalable, and hence, unsuitable for complex software systems. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to software testing. However, single-shot prompt engineering-based approaches tend to hallucinate and generate redundant test cases, resulting in fewer branches. To handle the above-mentioned limitations, in this paper, we propose FeedbackLLM, a novel automated language-agnostic test case generation framework based on tightly coupled two-stage approach. In the first stage, FeedbackLLM extracts the input constraints by parsing source code and generates the possible test cases. The quality of the test cases is evaluated in the second stage by the following two specialized LLM feedback agents: (i) Line Feedback Agent: extracts the metadata related to missed line executions and (ii) Branch Feedback Agent: extracts the metadata of the unexecuted branch conditions. The above agents operate in a two-stage process, communicating in tandem, and this procedure is repeated for k-steps. Further, we also introduced a redundancy prevention cache to avoid duplicate API requests and avoid unnecessary execution cycles. The performance of the proposed architecture is evaluated on the standard benchmark programs related to C and Python programs. FeedbackLLM demonstrated more line and branch coverage than baseline tools while scaling linearly in execution time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2023An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generationcited by 193
  2. 2020Unit Test Case Generation with Transformers and Focal Contextcited by 118
  3. 2023ChatUniTest: A Framework for LLM-Based Test Generationcited by 94
  4. 2022Pynguin: Automated Unit Test Generation for Pythoncited by 49
  5. 2023A3Test: Assertion-Augmented Automated Test Case Generationcited by 33
  6. 2022NNSmith: Generating Diverse and Valid Test Cases for Deep Learning Compilerscited by 29
  7. 2018Simulation-based Adversarial Test Generation for Autonomous Vehicles with Machine Learning Componentscited by 28
  8. 2023Reinforcement Learning from Automatic Feedback for High-Quality Unit Test Generationcited by 21
  9. 2019Requirements-driven Test Generation for Autonomous Vehicles with Machine Learning Componentscited by 17
  10. 2025The Prompt Alchemist: Automated LLM-Tailored Prompt Optimization for Test Case Generationcited by 16
  11. 2024TestBench: Evaluating Class-Level Test Case Generation Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 15
  12. 2024DeepREST: Automated Test Case Generation for REST APIs Exploiting Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
2 more
  1. 2025Automatic High-Level Test Case Generation using Large Language Modelscited by 5
  2. 2024A Tool for Test Case Scenarios Generation Using Large Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Large Language Models as Test Case Generators: Performance Evaluation and Enhancement
  2. 2025Challenges in Testing Large Language Model Based Software: A Faceted Taxonomy
  3. 2026TDD-Agent: Test-Driven Reasoning for Code Generation
  4. 2024SWT-Bench: Testing and Validating Real-World Bug-Fixes with Code Agents
  5. 2025TestForge: Feedback-Driven, Agentic Test Suite Generation
  6. 2026Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration for Unit Test Generation via Human-Testing-Inspired Workflows
  7. 2026CodeContests-O: Powering LLMs via Feedback-Driven Iterative Test Case Generation
  8. 2026Agent-Based Test Assertion Generation via Diverse Perspective Aggregation