mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spectral Graph Sparsification Preserves Representation Geometry in Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2605.01136 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.LG cs.SI math.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spectral graph sparsification is a classical tool for reducing graph complexity while preserving Laplacian quadratic forms. In graph neural networks (GNNs), sparsification is often used to accelerate computation while maintaining predictive performance. In this work, we study a complementary representation-level question: does sparsification preserve the geometry of learned embeddings? For polynomial-filter GNNs, we prove that any ε-spectral sparsifier induces O(ε) perturbations in polynomial graph filters, multilayer hidden representations, and their Gram matrices. These guarantees imply stability of squared pairwise distances, class means, and covariance structure in embedding space. We further establish finite-time training stability: under smoothness and boundedness assumptions, gradient descent on dense and sparsified graphs produces weight trajectories whose separation grows at most proportionally to the sparsification distortion. Empirically, effective-resistance sparsification validates the predicted perturbation chain on synthetic graphs and preserves hidden representation geometry on real datasets. In our experiments, the gram matrix and training dynamics show low divergence even under substantial sparsification, consistent with the predicted stability under spectral sparsification. Hidden Gram preservation strongly predicts neighborhood preservation and class-centroid stability across FashionMNIST, Cora, and Paul15. Together, these results show that spectral sparsification preserves not only graph operators, but also the representation geometry that supports downstream use of GNN embeddings for interpretability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 17 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  5. 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,097
  6. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  7. 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
  8. 2020Graph Neural Networks: Architectures, Stability and Transferabilitycited by 79
  9. 2021Transferability Properties of Graph Neural Networkscited by 42
  10. 2023A Neural Collapse Perspective on Feature Evolution in Graph Neural Networkscited by 19
  11. 2023Graph Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence on Large Graphscited by 16
  12. 2019Stability of Graph Neural Networks to Relative Perturbationscited by 11
1 more
  1. 2025Large-Scale Spectral Graph Neural Networks via Laplacian Sparsification: Technical Reportcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.