mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Multi-Agent Autonomous Reasoning in Hydrodynamics

arXiv 2605.01102 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.AI physics.ao-phcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Single-agent systems (SAS) have become the default pattern for LLM-driven scientific workflows, but routing planning, tool use, and synthesis through a single context window comes with a well-known cost: as tool specifications and observational traces accumulate, the effective context available for each decision shrinks, and end-to-end reliability suffers. We present a multi-agent system (MAS) prototype for hydrodynamics in which specialized agents are coordinated through a Layer Execution Graph (LEG). A planner agent constructs query-specific execution topologies from natural-language routing heuristics that capture domain knowledge without hard-coding it as rigid control logic; specialist agents operate under strict tool allowlists and occupy complementary data-class roles. Between layers, consolidator agents fuse parallel outputs into concise briefs, and a reporter agent synthesizes the final response, while the runtime logs provenance for every tool invocation to support auditability. All benchmarks, ablations, and stress tests use Claude Sonnet~4.6 as the backbone model for both specialist and general-purpose agents. Evaluated on 37 queries spanning six complexity categories, the prototype achieves 93.6% factual precision with a 100% pass rate. Accuracy remains above 90% across runs from single-threaded to five independent parallel tracks, and under simulated loss of individual data sources the system degrades gracefully, still returning substantive partial answers. Together, these results suggest that planner-guided, graph-structured multi-agent orchestration can meaningfully alleviate the context-saturation bottlenecks that constrain monolithic single-agent architectures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Rethinking the Value of Multi-Agent Workflow: A Strong Single Agent Baseline18 Jan

Other references · 7

  1. 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
  2. 2025Beyond Self-Talk: A Communication-Centric Survey of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 58
  3. 2025Single-agent or Multi-agent Systems? Why Not Both?cited by 28
  4. 2026A Hierarchical Multi-Agent System for Autonomous Discovery in Geoscientific Data Archivescited by 4
  5. 2025Natural Language Tools: A Natural Language Approach to Tool Calling In Large Language Agentscited by 3
  6. 2025MOSAIC: Multi-agent Orchestration for Task-Intelligent Scientific Codingcited by 2
  7. 2026Search, Do not Guess: Teaching Small Language Models to Be Effective Search Agentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Advancing Shared and Multi-Agent Autonomy in Underwater Missions: Integrating Knowledge Graphs and Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  2. 2026OceanMind: A multi-agent AI system for ocean diagnosis
  3. 2025Foam-Agent: A Large Language Model-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Automating Computational Fluid Dynamics Workflows
  4. 2026Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
  5. 2025ChatCFD: An LLM-Driven Agent for End-to-End CFD Automation with Structured Knowledge and Reasoning
  6. 2026Agentic Scientific Simulation: Execution-Grounded Model Construction and Reconstruction
  7. 2025Curriculum Guided Massive Multi Agent System Solving For Robust Long Horizon Tasks
  8. 2026Tools as Continuous Flow for Evolving Agentic Reasoning